![twink getting dooble penitrated twink getting dooble penitrated](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PVNjfNRDtP0/Sdoy-Wb7jFI/AAAAAAAAAIw/_DwoJc7OJmQ/s320/512scQalsCL.jpg)
When only one person is physically pursuing sex, and the other person has verbally consented that that’s what they’re into, it’s sex. When both partners are actively and enthusiastically participating, it’s sex. When people who believe that men can’t be raped are forced to justify their position, the argument usually goes something like this:Ī: If a person can’t legally consent to sex when they’re too drunk, what happens when both sex partners are too drunk to have sex? Why isn’t the man considered a victim of rape as well?ī: Even when two people are drunk, at least one of them has to physically initiate the sex act. Under this model, physical characteristics become shorthand for consent. I suspect this is why men are only seen as victims when their bodies are penetrated-it’s perceived as a feminine sexual position, and only female bodies can be victimized. According to the FBI’s definition, female bodies can be raped, but male bodies cannot. Here, sexual consent is defined not only by a person’s will, but by their physical attributes.
![twink getting dooble penitrated twink getting dooble penitrated](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_TXC0nAdHA5I/SayxfcCXwDI/AAAAAAAAAiI/Z95ZruBBDbI/s320/Deepika+Padukone+at+Fiama+Di+Wills+event+(18).jpg)
According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting system, forcible rape is “the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will.” To the FBI, the carnal knowledge of a male forcibly and against his will is considered a different (and lesser) crime: “assault.” The idea that rape is classified based on body parts isn’t just a cultural thing it’s a criminal thing, too. Because what really seems to be at issue here isn’t just anything that falls under the heading of sex, it’s really more what falls under the heading of “penetration.”īecause I’d bet those same (straight) men who have a hard time seeing/admitting a big problem with them being drunkenly led into having obligation/consequence-free sex would probably immediately see the situation very differently if the “sex” turned out to have involved them being on the penetrated end of a sex act (whether with a woman or a man). To get into even more touchy territory, maybe the word “sex” isn’t specific enough. Commenter Drew noted another cultural barrier to male victims of sexual assault-our tendency to conflate sexual violation with penetration. Men, according to the Gender Police, are seen as unrapeable-they are constantly expected to pursue sex, and are therefore impossible to violate. In today’s Sexist Beatdown, we discussed the reluctance to accept men as victims of sexual assault.